Only your org and invited staff log in here.
Players, parents, coaches & officials.
We support 30+ sports and keep adding more.
Adaptive programmes ask software for things it usually cannot do — divisions by functional classification rather than age, registration that collects access needs without a family having to justify them, and scheduling that accounts for transport and support workers. Here is what actually matters in running one.
Almost every sports platform organises athletes by date of birth, because almost every sport does. Adaptive programmes frequently do not. Grouping may be by functional classification, by ability band, by unified pairing, or by whatever your governing body specifies — and forcing that into age brackets produces divisions that make no competitive sense.
Whatever you group by, hold it on the athlete’s record rather than in a coach’s head. It determines who competes against whom, and it changes over time.
This is where most organizations fail families before the season starts. If mobility requirements, communication needs, equipment, support worker details and medical information are not on the registration form, a parent ends up explaining them separately to three different coaches — and explaining them repeatedly is exhausting in a way that people outside the situation consistently underestimate.
Ask for it once, on the form, as a normal question among normal questions. Not as a special case, not in an email afterwards, and not as something a family has to volunteer.
Then control who can see it. This is sensitive information and the people who need it are a small subset of your staff. Visibility should be a deliberate decision, not a side effect of being able to open a roster.
A session time change that is a minor inconvenience elsewhere can stop an athlete attending entirely. Accessible transport is booked in advance; a support worker’s hours are fixed; a venue that works may be the only one within range that does.
Practical consequences:
Participation costs in adaptive sport are often higher — specialist equipment, more staff, accessible transport — and household income is frequently lower. A public discount code is not the answer; it makes the arrangement visible to everyone.
Better: instalments available to anyone, a hardship rate applied to individual families, and the record of who is on what arrangement kept private to the staff who administer it.
Progress in adaptive sport is often attendance, personal bests and sustained participation rather than a table position. That is not a lesser measure — it is the one that matters, and it is also exactly what funders ask for.
Take attendance per session. It gives a coach something concrete for a family conversation, and it gives you defensible participation numbers when a grant report asks how many people a programme actually served. An estimate at year end is not the same thing and funders increasingly know it.
Group by classification, not age. Collect access needs once on the form and control who sees them. Give more notice on changes than you think you need. Take attendance, because it is both the progress record and the funding evidence.
Ask your athletes and families what they prefer and use that. Conventions differ between countries, sports and individuals, and the organization that asks rather than assuming gets it right more often than the one following a style guide.
Adaptive and inclusive sport covers divisions built on classification or ability band, access requirements as ordinary registration fields with role-controlled visibility, scheduling around venues and transport, scholarships applied privately, and attendance that exports for grant reporting.
They should be, where that is how your sport groups athletes. Functional classification, ability band or unified pairing can all be the basis for a division, and the classification belongs on the athlete record because it changes over time.
On the registration form, as ordinary fields alongside everything else — mobility, communication, equipment, support worker details and medical information. Asking once spares families explaining the same thing to several coaches.
Only the staff roles that need it. This is sensitive data and visibility should be a deliberate setting rather than something anyone who can open a roster inherits.
More than for a mainstream programme. Accessible transport and support worker hours are booked in advance, so a change announced two days out can stop an athlete attending entirely.
Attendance, participation and personal bests rather than league position. It is the more meaningful progress record for most adaptive programmes and it is what grant funders ask you to evidence.
Boxes, ladders and flights — and fixing matches that never happen.
What you need, the consent questions, and keeping it sustainable.
When to move, what to export first, and the mistakes that cost a season.
Register in minutes, or book a walkthrough and we'll tailor it to the way you already run things.